EyezOn Forum

I was busy creating a Visual Basic application to implement the TPI when I came across command 912 on page 8 of the TPI PDF. According to the document, the command returns 1 data byte. I assume this is a typo. Also, the descriptive text is exactly the same as command 900 which is not very helpful ...

cmh31909 wrote:Have there been any updated documents released? The only one's I can find are in this thread which is dated 2012, seven years old.

? Both of the PDFs in the first post of this thread are dated 2017-02-10.

My question is even more fundamental than that. He claimed "... we all know that best secure option is to use in offline mode and connected to internet via VPN /firewall access." For one: If it's "connected to the Internet" it's not off-line. And they'd have to break EyezOn's encryption to get ...

With only SSH access, tcpdump -p -n -i <interface> -X -s0 -w capturefile.pcap host <ip address> is my go-to, and then just scp/rsync the capturefile.pcap file to your computer and open in Wireshark. Yeah, it's almost certainly the re-use of the source port which is causing it. Since the EVL never ...

My first response is, what does a tcpdump/wireshark packet capture show?

I've used LUA a couple times but never with sockets. Is it re-using the source port? If so, can you fix it so it uses a random source port for each connection?

This should probably be a new thread...

proo wrote:Is there a simple way to check the current partition status, short of running as an always-on server and keeping track at all times?

Send a 001 "status report" and one of the things you'll get back is a 65x - a 650 or 653 means it's ready but not armed while a 652 is already armed.

When I bought our home, the very first thing I did was contact a local, reputable locksmith and have all the locks re-keyed. If I had not done that, and somebody'd subsequently burgled the home, would that have been the seller's fault, for failing to re-key all the locks for me? What, no blame on ...

GrandWizard wrote:...

Looks like I was mistaken about the cableco devices. I coulda swore they recently moved to device-specific passwords.

That attitude was fine 10 years ago, but nowadays it is completely unacceptable. Speaking as an IT professional with better than 25 years experience in the field: I disagree. Put quite simply: Anybody who exposes their private LAN to the Internet such that IoT devices are readily-accessible by ...

That attitude was fine 10 years ago, but nowadays it is completely unacceptable. You will be singing a different tune when it is your server/network which is down because of a massive DDoS attack. The Oct 21st attack which brought down Dyn was caused by IoIT devices with default passwords. Users ...